Growing up, I very rarely went to church. Poppa Mooselet's family was a fairly strict Irish Catholic one (they disowned him for a time following his divorce from his first wife), and Momma Mooselet's had similar roots but was less strict. That being said, neither of my parents were religious. PM was more devoted to Budweiser than Jesus, and MM had no use for the Catholic church after they turned their backs on her family when her father died, leaving Grandma Mooselet alone with 7 kids (MM was 11 years old). That being said, both of my parents believed in the Christian God.
My friends mostly went to CCD classes, and while I recall asking MM about them I never felt left out or a desire to go myself. As I got older I went to church now and again, mostly because it was a condition of my BFF Ree being allowed to sleep over on a Saturday night. But I never really understood why people went. If God was everywhere like my parents and friends said, why did people have to go into a man-made structure to talk to Him? Couldn't I go to a beautiful place created by Him and have a chat? Why did people need priests? Could they read the Bible for themselves and pray directly to God? And while we're on the subject of God being everywhere, what the hell was He doing in my tuna fish sandwich? Didn't He have anything better to do?
I asked a lot of questions as a kid.
So I grew up with an attitude that religion was fairly useless. People fought over who had the better God, or which interpretation of the Bible was correct. That's pretty fucked up. But when I pressed I said I still believed in God and I labeled my belief agnosticism without really knowing what that meant. As I got older I continued in this vein but called myself spiritual as well as agnostic. A fluffy feel-good answer that seemed to satisfy most people.
Except me. I started to examine what I really meant when I said I believed in a god but not a specific one. Why did I believe this? I couldn't really answer to my satisfaction - the best answer and most honest answer I could come up with was 'habit'. I took the time to look up what agnostic really meant and while I was surprised to learn it didn't mean what I thought it meant I found the definition resonated with me:
a person who holds that the existence of the ultimate cause, as god, and the essential nature of things are unknown and unknowable
Well duh! I had a light bulb moment. I had been right to call myself an agnostic, but was doing it for the wrong reason. I suddenly felt far more comfortable in my agnostic skin than I had ever been.
I have heard it said that agnosticism is a 'fence-sitting' position. You are either a believer or an atheist and one should choose a side. You are with us or against us. What a black-or-white bullshit view of the world. Do I believe in a god? No, personally I do not. However I am open to the idea of a such a deity if there was evidence to support such a being. Do I think this is likely? No, but I'm open to the idea as I cannot claim for certain one does not exist. I cannot prove a negative, after all. For all I know this exists:
Or my personal favourite:
Just as there is a range of those who follow a religous creed, from evangelical/fundamentalist to turn up to church a couple times of year there is a range of agnosticism and I would classify myself, based on the above statements, as an atheistic agnostic. Ramen.
Yeah, I can tell you're underwhelmed, particularly if you've followed me or known me for any length of time. But man does it feel good to say it out loud.